Freeland and Justin: hand-picked and parachuted |
Which is to say that the media do not behave like
individuals, but like craven pack animals. Though they can have ideological
slants, which can hasten or delay their arrival at a “story”, once a belly is
revealed they will turn and dine on the carcass.
But the Toronto Star’s response to Trudeau is perhaps most
embarrassing. We expect the Sun to shill and then feed if it means they can
make a nickel, and for the National Post to amuse us
with patrician disdain. But we hold the Star to a higher standard. Sadly, the
Star’s National Affairs correspondent Chantal Hébert, like so many others,
notably the CBC, was embarrassingly late to call Justin Trudeau to account.
During the leadership campaign Hébert wrote of “a grateful party establishment”, saying
that “Trudeau’s launch could turn out to be the most exciting moment of an
overlong campaign.”
It got worse. In April of this year she wrote a piece for
the Star with the headline “Justin
Trudeau measures up well to his Liberal predecessors”, with a sub-head that
read “Measured on the scale of the editorial board performances of his Liberal
predecessors, Justin Trudeau was substantively more solid.” The article managed
to make those claims without indicating the basis for such optimism – there was
not a single quote from Trudeau, or a reference to anything substantive in the
way of policy.
How quickly things change. After the Justin Unplugged “ladies
night”, an event that Trudeau did not organize, and a single – though rather
attenuated by Justin’s standards – gaffe when declaring totalitarian China as
his “most admired” government, Hébert has suddenly realized that Trudeau is, in
fact, a remarkably unimpressive politician.
The title of her piece in the Star on Wednesday, November 13,
was “Justin
Trudeau still making rookie mistakes”. Really? “Still?” When did we hear
her call out any of Justin Trudeau’s other “rookie mistakes”? The Conservatives
have certainly made hay of them, but the NDP has attempted to stay above the
fray and much of the media, well, they simply gave Trudeau a pass.
It was the strangest thing. No doubt reading the polls, journalists
commented on the amazing length of Trudeau’s “honeymoon,” all while helping him
extend his stay at the all-inclusive.
What happened with “ladies night” was simple. It’s called
Twitter. Despite having questions from the $250 a plate audience hand-picked by
his team, Justin still came up with his doozy about China. And he did this while
Twitter was in full swing with regard to the event itself, creating a perfect
storm of social media that was beyond his ability to control.
You can be sure of it: if the Twitterverse hadn’t skewered
Trudeau, Hébert would not be writing a
few days afterward that, while campaigning in Quebec:
“On a bad day
Ignatieff or Dion would have been hard-pressed to deliver a flatter stump
speech than Trudeau did.”
And...
“Reading from notes the rookie leader delivered rambling
remarks that belied his years on the public speaking circuit.”
And...
“If Trudeau wrote that text, he needs a speech writer. And
if someone else wrote it, he or she needs a new assignment.”
The truth is, Justin Trudeau has been mediocre from the
beginning. It just wasn’t news, because he was popular. Now it is news, and it
will continue to be news.
We may be early on this call, but La politica believes that
Canada has hit Peak Trudeau. Justin and his “team” which includes the
inimitable Jim Karygiannis
and handpicked “star” candidate Chrystia Freeland, who has been parachuted
into Toronto Centre in a typical old-style Liberal move, are at 35% in the polls.
That’s it – they’ve topped out, even if, as seems likely, they win a few by-elections.
(TE Wilson is the author of Mezcalero, a Detective Sánchez novel.)
(TE Wilson is the author of Mezcalero, a Detective Sánchez novel.)
No comments:
Post a Comment